FirewallFortinet

Role-Based Access Control for Remote Workers

Securely grant remote access based on user roles and device posture.

Implementing Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for Remote Workers

Okay, grabbed a seat, poured my third cup of coffee for the day and decided to do some little writeup on what has been consuming much of my time recently: Implementing Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) for our remote workers. When I first launched my career as a network admin in 1993 — yeah, long before most of you even dreamt the internet might exist — the transformation has been nothing less than breathtaking. From voice and data muxes over PSTN to the front lines of the Slammer worm, security has never been static. Today, remote work makes that goal both more challenging and more important.

Hybrid Access Challenges

Here’s the thing. It was the buzzword for years, remote work, but now everyone has to get it right. Hybrid access — that mashup of on-premises and remote users, devices, apps — transforms your tidy, sectioned network into a plate of spaghetti. Or, even worse, loose spaghetti.

Three banks recently called us panting following a frantic move to zero-trust architecture. Why? Because they were unprepared for the complexity of access. And you know what, I don’t even blame them. Some of what managing users who may be signing in from a coffee shop in Mumbai or a home office in Delhi entails:

  • Multiple access points
  • Diverse device security postures
  • Different user permissions per role – no “one size fits all

That’s why RBAC can’t be just a checkbox. It’s a lifeline.

RBAC Concepts

At its core, RBAC comes down to who can do what, to what, and when? Defining roles is critical. Let me go back to the early days: you were very likely giving users blanket access and hoping for the best. (Spoiler: The greatest never comes.)

Fast forward, and now PJ Networks designs RBAC polices that accommodates:

  • Job functions
  • Where it’s hosted (remote, on prem, hybrid)
  • Device trust status

Least privilege is the key (yeah, yeah I know that’s what everyone says, but it’s still gold). Each job has access to only what it needs — and nothing else. And nothing less, or users will rage-quit as soon as you can say password reset if they can’t do their jobs.

Deployment Patterns

This is where the tech comes in. With FortiAuthenticator and FortiAP we have integrated our SASE framework to deliver an RBAC model on all endpoints – whether they’re remote or in the building.

Here are some different nuggets we encountered in our recent projects:

  • FortiAuthenticator secures identity: it authenticates users and devices identity before they are granted network access. Multi-factor authentication? Non-negotiable.
  • FortiAP is your secure gateway and WLAN access point, enforcing role-based policies at the network’s edge.
  • All connected via PJ Networks SASE, fast, reliable and scalable. No more VPN bottle necks, no more users complaining about slow connections.

The fun part: these tools require you map RBAC policies, it’s not just copying a spreadsheet. You’ve got to

  • Define granular roles;
  • Map these roles to FortiAuthenticator user groups;
  • Configure FortiAP profiles with an access rule, by user role and device posture;
  • Test, test, test. (No room for oops — been burned on that a few too many times.)

The biggest lesson — and don’t lose sight that roles change. One contract worker today could be a full employee tomorrow. Dynamic RBAC policies are your friend.

Monitoring

I’ve been saying this since the early 2000s — monitoring is everything. You don’t detect and respond? Then you’re blind.

Post deployment, there’s 24×7 SOC support and a help desk provided by JB Networks (yes, that’s us) to keep an eye on RBAC enforcement.

Some real-life habits worthy of theft:

  • Access attempts are logged in a standard log file for an embarrasing amount.
  • Anomaly detection to detect weird behavior (e.g., a teller hitting the finance server… at three in the morning)

Automated alerts plus human eyeballs—you still want your SOC guys and gals thinking, not just machines

And now a few contentious words: I don’t trust any AI-powered solution offering 100% automated threat detection. AI comes in handy — but not as a substitute for the human touch.

PJ Networks SASE Pack

We’re not just dropping in Forti gear and walking away. Our SASE pack is a method to converge all of that — the firewall, the VPN, RBAC policies, and monitoring to check whether the users or endpoint device comply or not for access — into something that can actually be manageable.

Clients get:

  • Consolidated user management and authentication for FortiAP and FortiAuthenticator
  • Unified enforcement for cloud and on-prem apps
  • Scallable hybrid solutions
  • 24×7 SOC and helpdesk support

I’m pleased to say this approach resulted in the same banks I mentioned above having operational zero-trust architectures that work — and not just on the whiteboard, but in the daily life of the company.

Performance Metrics

You can’t manage what you can’t measure. That old bromide is still my north star.

When we deploy remote worker RBAC at PJ Networks, we keep an eye on:

  • Authentication success/failure rates – Are your users having difficulty? Too many failures can indicate a bad user experience, or attack attempts.
  • Access time latency – How quickly does your FortiAP respond to policies? Remember that no one wants to do the time-consuming work of challenging design remotely.
  • Incident of Policy Violation – unauthorized access / attempt? What patterns are emerging?
  • User behavior analytics — It’s all about finding anything out of the ordinary early.

That information, kept for us — so we can keep our clients — ahead of issues before they become massive.

Quick Take

  • Hybrid access equals more exposure; RBAC is your protection.
  • Specify roles clearly and keep them current.
  • FortiAuthenticator + FortiAP + PJ Networks SASE = robust RBAC enforcement.
  • Keep monitoring continuously—do not rely on AI-driven magic to do it for you.
  • Collect performance data to ensure a smooth user experience.

So, yeah, RBAC for remote workers isn’t an optional nice-to-have, it’s mission critical. And believe me, as a guy who ran networks in the early days of PSTN and survived Slammer, these are the sort of challenges that it really takes to keep me wired (sorry for the pun).

Anyway, I’ve got to get to coffee No. If you find RBAC boring, you probably just haven’t met the implementation for you yet.

What's your reaction?

Related Posts