FirewallNews

FortiGate FG-30G vs FG-40F vs Palo Alto PA-440 vs Sophos XGS 107 — Entry Level Firewall Comparison 2026

Choosing the right entry-level firewall for your small office or branch. Based on official datasheets from Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, and Sophos.

Spec Comparison — Official Datasheets

SpecFG-30GFG-40FPA-440XGS 107
Firewall Throughput4 Gbps5 Gbps3 Gbps3.9 Gbps
IPS Throughput800 Mbps1 Gbps280 Mbps620 Mbps
NGFW Throughput570 Mbps800 Mbps
Concurrent Sessions600K700K95K
IPsec VPN3.5 Gbps4.4 Gbps800 Mbps600 Mbps
New Sessions/s
Form FactorDesktop, fanlessDesktop, fanlessDesktop, fanlessDesktop, fanless

Official Datasheet References (downloaded PDFs):
FortiGate 30G Official Datasheet |
FortiGate 40F Official Datasheet |
FortiGate 100F Official Datasheet |
Palo Alto PA-400 Series Official Datasheet |
Palo Alto Enterprise Product Summary

All performance values are “up to” and vary by configuration. Sources: Fortinet official datasheets (FG-30G, FG-40F), Palo Alto Networks PA-440 datasheet, Sophos XGS 107 specifications.

FG-30G vs FG-40F — G-Series vs F-Series

The FG-30G is Fortinet’s newest entry-level G-series with FortiSP5 7nm chip. The FG-40F uses the older SOC4 SPU. Despite the newer chip, the 40F still edges the 30G on firewall throughput (5 vs 4 Gbps) and IPS (1 Gbps vs 800 Mbps). For most 1-10 user deployments with 50-100 Mbps internet links, both perform identically. The 30G is better for new deployments due to longer lifecycle, but the 40F is more widely available and proven.

Palo Alto PA-440

The PA-440 delivers 3 Gbps firewall throughput and 280 Mbps threat prevention. Session capacity is limited at 95K concurrent sessions — significantly lower than either FortiGate model. At approximately $2,500+ fully loaded vs $800 for the FG-40F, the PA-440 costs 3x more for substantially lower IPS and VPN throughput. Palo Alto’s App-ID provides better application visibility, but the performance-to-cost ratio significantly favors FortiGate at the entry level.

Sophos XGS 107

Mid-range IPS performance (620 Mbps) between the two FortiGate options. Sophos Central management is a genuine advantage for multi-site SMB deployments. However, VPN throughput (600 Mbps) trails both FortiGate models.

Verdict

FG-30G for new deployments (longer lifecycle). FG-40F for availability and proven reliability. Both outperform the PA-440 at 1/3 the cost. Sophos XGS 107 is best for Sophos-ecosystem customers.

Official Datasheet References (downloaded PDFs):
FortiGate 30G Official Datasheet |
FortiGate 40F Official Datasheet |
FortiGate 100F Official Datasheet |
Palo Alto PA-400 Series Official Datasheet |
Palo Alto Enterprise Product Summary

What's your reaction?

Related Posts