FortiGate FG-70G vs FG-70F vs FG-80F vs Palo Alto PA-460 vs Sophos XGS 136 — Mid-Range SMB Comparison 2026

The 70-series and 80-series serve 25-100 users. G-series vs F-series comparison with Palo Alto and Sophos equivalents. Based on official datasheets.

Spec Comparison — Official Datasheets

Spec FG-70G FG-70F FG-80F PA-460 XGS 136
Firewall 10 Gbps 6 Gbps 10 Gbps 12.6 Gbps 11.5 Gbps
IPS 2.5 Gbps 1.4 Gbps 2.6 Gbps 1.9 Gbps 4 Gbps
NGFW 1.5 Gbps 1 Gbps 1 Gbps (Threat)
Sessions 1.4M 1.5M 1.5M 1M
VPN 7.1 Gbps 6.1 Gbps 6.5 Gbps 3 Gbps 4 Gbps

Official Datasheet References (downloaded PDFs):
FortiGate 30G Official Datasheet |
FortiGate 40F Official Datasheet |
FortiGate 100F Official Datasheet |
Palo Alto PA-400 Series Official Datasheet |
Palo Alto Enterprise Product Summary

FG-80F IPS is 2.6 Gbps per official Fortinet datasheet. XGS 136 firewall is 11.5 Gbps, IPS 4 Gbps, threat protection 1 Gbps per Sophos datasheet. All values “up to”.

The G-Series Advantage

FG-70G with FortiSP5 delivers 2.5 Gbps IPS — significantly better than the transitional FG-70F (1.4 Gbps). The FG-80F has the highest IPS in the F-series at this tier (2.6 Gbps). The FG-70F is a transitional model best avoided.

Palo Alto PA-460 vs Sophos XGS 136

PA-460: 12.6 Gbps firewall, 1.9 Gbps IPS. XGS 136: 11.5 Gbps firewall, 4 Gbps IPS (leading on IPS). FortiGate FG-80F: 2.6 Gbps IPS, 6.5 Gbps VPN — best VPN throughput in class.

Verdict

FG-70G for 25-50 users. FG-80F for 50-80 users needing 10 GE ports with higher IPS (2.6 Gbps). XGS 136 leads on raw IPS but Sophos threat protection is lower.

Exit mobile version