Cyber Resilience vs. Cybersecurity: Which One Stops Ransomware?

Cyber Resilience vs Cybersecurity: Which One Stops Ransomware?

For the third time today after my coffee, I am staring through my firewall logs—again! There’s something about watching packets move (or get blocked) that just gives me the same satisfaction as watching the perfect-tuned car engine purr. But this is not a story about networks or packet captures. This is about something I’ve probably been asked a hundred times just this year: What’s better against ransomware — cybersecurity or cyber resilience?

Short answer? Cybersecurity. Long answer? Well, read on.

Quick Take

If you’re short on time:

If you prevent ransomware from executing, you don’t have to recover from it in a resilient manner.

Ok, so let’s unpack this.

What is Cybersecurity?

Cybersecurity is what I based my career on — back in the early ’90s, when Slammer was knocking out SQL servers faster than you could patch them. It is your first line of defense against ransomware.

Cybersecurity includes:

And here’s the truth: whether I’m working on ancient-school multiplexers or modern-day zero-trust systems, I know an effective cybersecurity game plan stops ransomware at the door.

Example? A client of ours had a ransomware attack attempt last year. Their behavioral AI-based EDR (and okay, I doubt AI, but this time, it did work) intercepted suspicious activity before encryption began. No infections. No downtime. No need for resilience. This is also why cybersecurity trumps cyber resilience when it comes to ransomware. Because if you’re relying on resilience, that means you’ve already been struck.

What is Cyber Resilience?

Cyber resilience is akin to having airbags and seatbelts — nice to have, but not replacing good brakes.

It’s how well you recover from an attack. And yes, it matters, particularly as threats are becoming nastier. Even superb cybersecurity can’t be perfect (not when insiders are sharing phishing emails like lottery tickets).

Cyber resilience includes:

Resilience does NOT equate to ignoring security best practices. Those banks that I assisted in upgrading their zero-trust architecture? They didn’t wait for a hit to strengthen security. Smart move.

Difference & Business Benefit

Security Comes First, Resilience Second. A cyber-secure organization will need to be resilient less often. Simple math.

But let’s talk benefits:

And ransomware, specifically? Cybersecurity wins. Any day.

Cyber Resilience Strategy of PJ Networks

Security First Approach at PJ Networks

Just counting on resilience alone is like locking your front door and leaving your windows wide open. Here’s how we approach building ransomware protection for businesses:

  1. Lock Down Perimeter Security – Firewalls (yes, properly configured ones) remain important, plus zero-trust policies.
  2. Autonomous Endpoint Security – EDR provides solutions that not only detect but block threats before execution.
  3. User Access Control – As 70% of breaches concern stolen credentials. Least privilege is a must-have, not a nice-to-have.
  4. Awareness Training (Boring, Yet Realistic) – Your employees need to be able to recognize a phishing attempt, or you are already at risk.
  5. Air-Gapped Backups (For True Resilience) – You say it’s about resilience, but is that hypothesis valid? No online-only backup solutions.

Conclusion

I just returned from DefCon, where ransomware was being tested on live hardware in the hacking village. It reminded me of one simple fact: attackers evolve. If you’re not actively defending your systems, you’re just biding your time until you get attacked.

Cyber resilience matters — don’t get me wrong. But for ransomware? Good cybersecurity means that resilience is unnecessary in the first place.

Want to avoid ransomware? Prioritize security. Use actual firewall rule sets. Restrict unnecessary privileges from being granted. Do not depend only on cyber resilience. Because if you’re depending on resilience, it means you’ve already lost round one.

Now, onto my fourth coffee.

Exit mobile version